Archive for November 13th, 2007

h1

Lock and Load

November 13, 2007

A recent letter to the editor in my campus paper read as:

 Gun advocates conveniently sidestep the subject of experience as well. The claim is that armed students could have gunned down Cho Seung-Hui before his rampage claimed the lives of many students and faculty.

However, I challenge gun advocates to predict the outcome of any given violent situation. It seems much more likely that the tension and anxiety of such a predicament would lead to additional harm if more shooters were introduced.

What if the tragedy at Virginia Tech evolved into a gun-battle with a madman on one side and students on the other?

As a student at UTSA, I can firmly say that if students are allowed to carry guns onto campus, I will feel much more unsafe. We should not allow ourselves to submit to the fear of another campus shooting and react by arming the populous.

The only responsible way to respond to such tragedies is with solidarity: do not allow the campus to become a breeding ground for gun violence.

But that letter got a great response from Allison Aldrich, a junior at Virginia Tech, and fellow conservative activist:

That is wonderful that you don’t trust a student with a firearm to defuse a treacherous scene. Who, then, DO you trust?

Do you trust the police? Because I personally saw the police scrambling around on my campus after the first shootings with no idea where the shooter was headed.

With police response times as they are (and that is in no way their fault) people are ultimately responsible for their own security. I would rather be armed and ready to protect myself, even if it does make people like you a little squeamish to see someone with a gun.

And your idea that the only responsible way to respond to such tragedies is with “solidarity” is about the most absurd claim in your entire article.

What would you have campuses do? Join hands and sing Kumbaya?

There is no way to make 100 percent of the people feel welcome and loved 100 percent of the time. And even if you could, you aren’t accounting for the mentally deranged people who will not respond to you no matter how many hugs you give them.

Hopefully schools like Virginia Tech and UTSA soon realize that instead of protecting students with these kinds of policies, they are taking away the right we have to protect ourselves.

Until then, just remember when you’re deciding what life-threatening policies to follow, it is better to be judged by twelve than carried by six.

h1

New P*rn Club at My Alma Mater….

November 13, 2007

http://www.ksat.com/video/14579038/index.html?taf=ant

Two students who joked about a p*rn club have decided to make it a reality. “Club X” as it’s being called by Riley Jackson Starr, a stripper and UTSA student, believes that the club will promote safe sex because p*rn actors wear condoms.

Condoms do not equal safe sex.

Dr. Miriam Grossman, a psychiatrist and senior fellow with the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute writes:

Then why, I wonder, do we hear nothing of another widespread behavior associated with malignant tumors of the mouth and throat?

The New England Journal of Medicine recently reported that cancer of the tonsils and base of the tongue are rising annually, and the evidence that oral HPV infection can cause these tumors is “compelling.” Having more than five oral-sex partners increased the risk of these malignancies by 250 percent.

The Journal’s conclusion: “The widespread oral sex practices among adolescents may be a contributing factor in this increase.”

Teens consider oral sex less risky and more acceptable. No doubt that’s why 20 percent of ninth graders and 50 percent of all teens have engaged in it. Ninth graders, by the way, are around 14 years old.

We are all taught since middle school the myth that condoms make sex safe and fine. But that is not the case. Latex is not the magical wand that suddenly removes all psychological side effects from promiscuity and disease from behaviors associated with sex.

Dr. Grossman furthers:

For example, I write about “safer sex” guidelines and the false sense of security they confer. I have seen many students, mostly women, who follow those guidelines religiously and still face a diagnosis of herpes, warts or pregnancy. A high price is paid physically and emotionally, but the dogma of “safer sex” goes unchallenged. The ideology of permissiveness depends on it.

Many e-mails I’ve received from readers are extraordinarily candid. Sarah, for example, wrote: “I met a guy who asked me out. I didn’t really like him at first, but he was nice, so I agreed. Since a bunch of friends had sex with multiple guys and bragged about it, I figured it would be no big deal to sleep with this guy. I did, and suddenly I felt like I couldn’t live without him.”

When Sarah stopped hearing from the fellow a few weeks later, she felt devastated and started drinking heavily. “I’ve hooked up with two other guys I just met, but I can’t forget the first guy,” she wrote. “In your book you explain there’s a biological reason for this, which helps me feel less crazy.”

Sarah was referring to oxytocin, a hormone released during sexual behavior. Research indicates it promotes feelings of attachment and trust. This may partly explain Sarah’s reaction to what she assumed were inconsequential encounters. “I feel lied to by everyone, including my school and magazines, that makes it seem like sex is just another thing to do on the weekend,” Sarah wrote.
There are lots of Sarahs on campus. In fact, at least 40% of sexually active undergrads nationwide have had experiences like Sarah’s. Having grown up watching “Friends” and “Sex and the City,” they arrive on campus believing the PC ideology about sexuality: I can party like Phoebe and Samantha and never pay a price.
Of course, in real life, Phoebe and Samantha would have warts, herpes, abnormal Pap tests, episodes of depression and a few abortions in their history.
Instead of declaring war on hooking up—as we have done on tobacco, alcohol and fast food—most campuses support the PC ideology. Casual sexual behavior is a given; some universities even say OK to group sex and other fringe activities—use latex, get tested and keep “Plan B” on hand, just in case.

This approach places sexual freedom ahead of sexual health. Students ought to be warned of the pain and hazards of fleeting, empty relationships—even with latex. Their physical and emotional vulnerability are critical, but neglected, issues. PC or not, it’s time we acknowledge this crisis and deal with it.

Want a real safe sex lesson?

Hear Dr. Grossman speak at Trinity University on December 4th at 7pm in San Antonio, TX.

For more info or to RSVP email yct_utsa@yahoo.com

Visit our event page on Facebook! Please invite your friends.